<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Brainer Link from a &#8220;Do-Follow&#8221; Dental Directory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thesemfirm.com/index.php/2009/01/28/no-brainer-link-from-a-do-follow-dental-directory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thesemfirm.com/index.php/2009/01/28/no-brainer-link-from-a-do-follow-dental-directory/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:35:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Visible Dentist</title>
		<link>http://www.thesemfirm.com/index.php/2009/01/28/no-brainer-link-from-a-do-follow-dental-directory/comment-page-1/#comment-1156</link>
		<dc:creator>The Visible Dentist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesemfirm.com/?p=531#comment-1156</guid>
		<description>Just saw your post on this -- and thought I&#039;d relay my experience. 

As a dental marketer, it&#039;s quite common and acceptable for me to represent dentists on their behalf.

Several months back I submitted a client&#039;s website to the directory. Afterwards, the guy who runs the directory, Erik Cunningham, replied by telling me the site is available only to dentists -- but that he would go ahead this time and allow the listing.

I checked just now and the dentist&#039;s listing has been removed. Gee thanks Erik.

Apparently Mr. Cunningham doesn&#039;t realize that 99.99% of dentists hire someone else to market their practice and their websites. Restricting his dental directory to only dentists themselves is probably why you only see 2 listings in his entire directory.

Not only do I suspect the *** free *** listings to be just a hook to solicit Mr. Cunningham&#039;s other services, the listings expose the dentist&#039;s email address to automated email harvesters which then flood the doctor&#039;s box with spam.

Sorry -- but this directory is a poor choice for dentists -- on multiple levels.

John Barremore
Houston, TX</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just saw your post on this &#8212; and thought I&#8217;d relay my experience. </p>
<p>As a dental marketer, it&#8217;s quite common and acceptable for me to represent dentists on their behalf.</p>
<p>Several months back I submitted a client&#8217;s website to the directory. Afterwards, the guy who runs the directory, Erik Cunningham, replied by telling me the site is available only to dentists &#8212; but that he would go ahead this time and allow the listing.</p>
<p>I checked just now and the dentist&#8217;s listing has been removed. Gee thanks Erik.</p>
<p>Apparently Mr. Cunningham doesn&#8217;t realize that 99.99% of dentists hire someone else to market their practice and their websites. Restricting his dental directory to only dentists themselves is probably why you only see 2 listings in his entire directory.</p>
<p>Not only do I suspect the *** free *** listings to be just a hook to solicit Mr. Cunningham&#8217;s other services, the listings expose the dentist&#8217;s email address to automated email harvesters which then flood the doctor&#8217;s box with spam.</p>
<p>Sorry &#8212; but this directory is a poor choice for dentists &#8212; on multiple levels.</p>
<p>John Barremore<br />
Houston, TX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
